Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14196 (AP)

YANGA SREE USIRKAYALA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21/2026 · 2026-01-05

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.21 of 2026 APHC010000012026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 21/2026 Between: 1. YANGA SREE USIRKAYALA, W/O SIVA SHANKAR MOULI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEAR, R/O 10-35-8/1, BHANOJI NAGAR, MAHRANIPET, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM, 530002, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 522238, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 522503, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 521001, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 520007, A P 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION KRISHNA DISTRICT, 521101, A.P. 6. YARLAGADDA VENKATA RAO, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS MLA GANNAVARAM, R/O SENTINI HOSPITAL, BESIDE 2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.21 of 2026 VINAYAKA THEATER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 520008, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondent 3 to 5 to produce the detainee i.e., MVS Hari Prasad, S/0 M S V Ramana, Aged about 40 years, R/o 10-35-8/1, Bhanoji Nagar, Mahranipet, Visakhapatnam, from the illegal custody of 3rd respondent, before the Honble Court and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to initiate action against 3rd Respondent, for the illegal detention of the detainee and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.21 of 2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the corpus is now at large and he is not in the illegal confinement or detention of the respondent. 2. Therefore, recording the same, permission, as sought for, is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 06.01.2026 SNI 4 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.21 of 2026 52 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA W.P.No.21 of 2026 (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) Date: 06.01.2026 SNI