HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13037 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Mr. Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "(a) to issue any writ or order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing declaration impugned final result 28.07.2026 (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition) issued by the respondent No.2 so far as the Hindi Subject is concerned. (b) Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authority to not to take any further action in pursuance of the final result dated 28.07.2026 unless the objections of the Petitioners is decided and duly informed to the petitioners. (c) Issue an order or direction be issued for cancelling the result published of Hindi Subject dated 28.07.2026 and direct the respondent authority to conduct the re-examination for Hindi Subject. (d) Issue a writ, order or direction be issue by this Hon'ble Court accordingly by deleting the aforesaid questions and declare the result on the remaining questions. (e) To issue any other or further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. (f) To award cost of the Petition to the Petitioners." 3. The issue in question has already been settled by the Lucknow Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 28.09.2026 passed in Writ-A No.8055 of 2026 (Seema Gupta And 20 Others vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Singh, Sanjay Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi Sandeep Kumar And 13 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 4. Considering the fact that a decision has already been taken by the respondent authorities that option no. 'C' and option No.'D' both are correct in respect of question no.102, the natural consequence would be that all the candidates who had answered the question no.102 by giving answer 'C' or answer 'D' would be entitled to the marks. The respondents may take a decision and proceed with the declaration of result accordingly. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of, accordingly. October 6, 2026 K.N. WRIA No. 13037 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad