Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14190 (KAR)

SRI GANGAPPA V v. SMT. GANGAMMA

RSA/1815/2022 · 2026-04-10

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20323 RSA No. 1815 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1815 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI GANGAPPA V S/O LATE.VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE HESARAGHATTA HOBLI 560 089 BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI.MOHAN KUMAR M.,ADVOCATE .. ABSENT) AND: 1(a) 1(b) 1 (c) 1 (d) SMT. GANGAMMA D/O LT VENKATAPPA DEAD BY LRS MUNIYAPPA S/O LT KENCHAKALAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS SMT NETHRA D/O LT GANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SMT SWETHA D/O LT GANGAMMA AGED 33 YEARS SRI CHETAN S/O LT GANGAMMA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20323 RSA No. 1815 of 2022 REPONDENTS 1(a) to 1(D) ARE R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE HESARGHATTA HOBLI 560089 BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 2. SMT.RADHAMMA W/O LT MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE HESARGHATTA HOBLI 560089 BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 3. SMT PADMAVATHI W/O LT MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED 58 YEARS R/AT GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE NAGASHETTIHALLI POST BENGALURU 560 094 4. SMT MANJUANTHA S/O LT MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE NAGASHETTIHALLI POST BENGALURU 560 094 5. SMT. MEENA D/O LT MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED 33 YEARS R/AT GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE NAGASHETTIHALLI POST BENGALURU 560 094 6. SRI PUNITH S/O LT MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE NAGASHETTIHALLI POST BENGALURU 560094 … RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20323 RSA No. 1815 of 2022 (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H P.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R -1 (a, b & d)) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.09.2022 PASSED IN RA.No.107/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.05.2019 PASSED IN OS No.1204/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of appellant when the matter is called at 03.54 p.m. Learned counsel for Respondent No.1(a,b & d) is present. 2. It is seen that on the previous two dates of hearing, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. The matter is of the year 2022. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, there is no representation on behalf - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20323 RSA No. 1815 of 2022 of the appellant. It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26