JULIUS KACHHAP v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/950/2026 · 2026-02-16
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14183 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14183 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.950 of 2026
.... Julius Kachhap, aged about 80 years, son of Late Victor Kachhap, resident of BG- 6/4A, Sharon Apartment, DIOCESAN Village, Sirom Toli Chowk, Old Hazaribagh Road, P.O.-G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S.-Chutia, District-Ranchi, PIN-834001, Mobile- 8709914320, Aadhaar-9993 6386 8392; E-Mail id: juliuskachhap@gmail.com;
.… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi
2. Principal Secretary, Land Reforms & Land Revenue Department, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi
3. Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh
4. Shri Rajesh Kumar, father’s name not know to the Petitioner, at present posted and working as Sub Divisional Officer, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad
5. Shri Kumar Mayank Bhushan, father’s name not known to the Petitioner, posted as Circle Officer, Sadar, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S.-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh
.... Respondents
.... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner
: Mr. A.K.Sahani, Adv. For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III
....
02/16.02.2026
1. Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
“i. For commanding upon the respondents, more particularly the respondent No.5, to provide Certified copy of the report submitted by Amin in respect of Land Measurement Case No:102/2023-24 and Land Measurement Case No: 103/2023-24 along with Map within a reasonable period; AND for a further direction upon the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against the respondent Nos.4 and 5 for non-compliance of their official duties and for their prosecution under Sections 3 and-4 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 (in short, "the Act, 1989") for committing offence under Section 3(v) and 4 of the said Act and within a reasonable period; And/Or for issuance of any such Writ/Order/Direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and for doing conscionable justice to the Petitioner.”
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
2026:JHHC:4205
2 W.P.(C) No.950 of 2026
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
16.02.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 17.02.2026