Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14182 (CHH)

Amir Das Deshlahare v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

WPS/191/2015 · 2026-02-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:CGHC:9754 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 191 of 2015 Amir Das Deshlahare S/o Sawant Deshlahare Aged About 64 Years Retired From The Post Of Sahayak Antrik Lekha Parikshan Eavam Kararopan Adhikari, R/o Jagannathpour Parsbod, Post, Thana And Tah Saja, District Durg, Cg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through Secretary, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Mantralaya, New Raipur, CG, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Panchayat And Social Services, Sanchanalaya, Raipur, CG, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director Panchayat And Social Welfare District Durg, CG, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saja, District Durg, CG, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Ghanshyam Patel, Dy GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 24.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit that original petitioner is having his wife and son but they are also not taking care of the petition and not in contact with him. Since the original petitioner has died and his legal representatives even the brother of the petitioner, who has filed the application for substitution, are not in contact with him learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is having no instructions in the case. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.03.03 10:21:45 +0530 Wps 191 of 2015 2 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Legal representatives of the original petitioner are at liberty to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma