Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14178 (JHR)

BANTI YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1246/2026 · 2026-03-26

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8621 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1246 of 2026 ----- Banti Yadav, S/o Suresh Prasad Yadav, R/o Village- Sarua, P.O. + P.s. Gawan, District- Giridih .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Govind Ray Karan, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, AddI. P.P. …...... 03/ 26.03.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 304(B)/ 34 of IPC. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned AddI. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected. Petitioner is the husband. There is allegation of matrimonial discord, torture, assault and demand. The deceased died in the matrimonial house and the cause of death is poisoning. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Gawan (Khori Mahuwa) P.S. Case No.31 of 2024 (S.T. No.584 of 2024), pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V at Giridih, stands rejected. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 7. It is expected that the Trial Court will conclude the trial at earliest without giving unnecessary adjournment to the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt a copy of this order. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 26th March, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 30/03/2026