Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14174 (BOM)

RAJKUMARI BRAMHAPRAKASH THAKUR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/12739/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} wp12739-26.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12739 OF 2026 Rajkumar Bramhaprakash Thakur and Others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Vishal P. Bakal, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Anand P. Bhandari, Advocate for Respondents No.3 and 4 ....... [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 28 th SEPTEMBER, 2026 ORDER : 1. This motion is moved for the ‘speaking to the minutes’ in respect of order dated 22nd September, 2026. 2. In paragraph No.1, in last but one line, following sentence is typed “Portion of construction of their houses which is within fifteen (15) meters area of development plan (D.P.) road”. 3. Learned Advocates for the Petitioners and Respondents fairly submit that, after the word “houses”, words “excluding the Portion” is inadvertently remained to be typed in the order. It is further submitted that in the third paragraph, words “and 2026:BHC-AUG:43375-DB This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // {2} wp12739-26.doc remaining” are required to be substituted by the word “from”. 3. Accordingly, the order be corrected. Corrected copy be uploaded. Motion is allowed. [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/wp12739-26.doc This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //