CRM-M-2621 IN THE (135) KIRANDEEP STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. passed by the arising out of F of Narcotic D Act”) at Polic his bail was ca arrest was ord have been orde 26214-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da DEEP RAM ALIAS KARNA Versus
OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Ms. Janya Sirhoi, Advocate for th Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashin y the Court of Learned Sessions Judg ut of FIR No.218 dated 09.11.2020 re otic Drugs and Psychotropic Substan Police Station Kabarwala, District S was cancelled and bonds were forfeit as ordered to be issued against him. en ordered to be issued against him for JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-26214-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.05.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA
for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab uashing of order dated 26.11.2025 s Judge Sri Muktsar Sahib in case 020 registered under Sections 21B ubstances Act (for short “NDPS trict Sri Muktsar Sahib, whereby forfeited to the State. Warrant of him. Now fresh warrant of arrest im for 21.05.2026. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.11 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2621 2. absence before and his Trial wrong date of join proceedin and conditions petition deserv 3. 4. asking of the C order and, ther 5. parties. 6. or infirmity in account of his petitioner is re and is ready to by the Trial C petitioner to su the date alread well as surety 26214-2026 (O&M) (2) It is argued by learned counsel before the Learned Trial Court was n Trial Court counsel could not appear ate of hearing. His absence was not ceedings before the Learned Trial Cou ditions to be imposed upon him. It is deserves to be allowed. Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts n f the Court and argued that there is n erefore, the petition does not dese This Court has heard the rival On perusal of record, this Court ity in the impugned order since the of his non-appearance, however, keep r is ready to join the proceedings bef ady to abide by the terms and conditio rial Court, the petition is disposed o r to surrender before the Trial Court already fixed and on doing so and f urety bonds to the satisfaction of Lear ounsel for the petitioner that his was not intentional as he himself appear due to some noting down as not intentional. He is ready to al Court and to abide by the terms . It is, therefore, argued that the epts notice of the petition on the re is no illegality in the impugned t deserve to be allowed. rival submissions made by the Court does not find any illegality ce the same has been passed on r, keeping in view the fact that the gs before the Learned Trial Court onditions to be imposed upon him sed of by giving direction to the Court on or before 21.05.2026 i.e. and furnishing fresh personal as f Learned Trial Court and further AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.11 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2621 on depositing Services Auth bail by the Tri 7.

11.05.2026 Amit Sharma 26214-2026 (O&M) (3) siting cost to the tune of Rs.5,000/ Authority (DLSA), Sri Muktsar Sah he Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Whether speaking/reasoned:
   ,000/- before the District Legal ar Sahib, he shall be admitted to t to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.11 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.