VAIJNATH NANDKISHOR BARTAKKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/71/2021 · 2026-10-01
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14168 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14168 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 913 CP-71.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2021 IN WP/3007/2017 VAIJNATH NANDKISHOR BARTAKKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioner. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent-State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2026 Per Court :
1. None for the petitioner.
2. As per the order under contempt, respondents No.3 was to decide the proposals of the petitioner, however, learned APP, by pointing out the affidavit-in-reply submits that the proposals of the petitioner are already decided. The decision on the said proposals is also annexed, which is dated 15th March, 2021.
3. As such, nothing survives in this contempt petition and it stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde