Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14165 (MAD)

K.SAMPATH v. K.Senthil Kumar

CONT P/189/2026 · 2026-03-03

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 K.Sambath S/o.Kannan Water Tank Street Sundakka Palayam Hamlet Kariyamangalam Revenue Village and Post, Chengam Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. K.Senthil Kumar The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer Near Periyar Statue Tindivanam Salai Thiruvannamalai Town and Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. 2. S.Ramprabhu (Tahsildhar) O/o. The Tahsildhar Chengam Town and Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 3. A.Mirunalini The Block Development Officer (Scheme and General BDO) O/o. The Block Development Officer Chengam Town and Taluk Thiruvannamalai District. Contemnor(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the alleged wilful disobedience of the order dated 02.04.2019 in WP.No.6885 of 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of an order which has been passed way back on 02.04.2019. 2. Though no time limit was fixed for compliance of the order, authorities are required to comply with the order of the Court within reasonable period. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 3. As to what step has been taken in compliance of the order of the Court is not known. If petitioner files fresh petition, the Court may examine the matter. However, contempt proceedings, at this stage, cannot be initiated alleging disobedience of the order passed way back in 2019. 4. Contempt petition is closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 03.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.189 of 2026 03.03.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis