APHC010001892026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 457/2026 Between: 1. G BHARATHI, W/O LATE GOLLA AKKULAPPA, D/O GOUNI RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 53 YRS, R/O D.NO.2-75, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, YENUMULLA PALLI, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAL DISTRICT- 515134. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT COMPLEX VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHI 3. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GORANTLA POLICE STATION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GORANTIA (M), SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER SHO, GORANTLA POLICE STATION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. 6. BESTHA VENKATESH, S/O BESTHA VENKATARAMAPPA, R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST, GORANTLA MANDIA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 7. 7. PEDDINENI RAVI ALIAS KOREVULAPALLI RAVI, S/O KOREVULAPALLI LAKSHMINARAYANA, R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST GORANTLAMANDIA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 8. SALLA SREENIVASULU, S/O SALLA NARAYANAPPA, R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST, GORANTLA MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 9. 9. BESTHA LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O BESTHA VENKATARAMAPPA R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST, GORANTLA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 10 10. BESTHA VENKATESH, S/O BESTHA VENKATARAMAPPA, R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST, GORANTLAMANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 11. 11. BESTHA GURUMURTHY, S/O BESTHA VENKATARAMAPPA, R/O DIGUVA GANGAMPALLI VILLAGE,GANGAMPALLI POST, GORANTLA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to pass an order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.2,3 and 5 in taking action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.07.2025 as arbitrary and illegal and violation of petitioners right guaranteed under Article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take immediate action and protect the life and liberty and the property of the petitioner and her family” 2. Heard Sri R.Harish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint made by the petitioner, the police conducted a preliminary enquiry into the issue, and the enquiry revealed that no such incident had occurred. It was further found that a civil suit is pending between the parties and that the matter is purely civil in nature. Therefore, the police did not choose to register any crime on the complaint made by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies before appropriate forum. 3 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.01.2026 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.457 of 2026 Dt.07.01.2026 Asr