Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14164 (JHR)

DEEN DAYAL SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7181/2023 · 2026-03-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7508 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.7181 of 2023 Deen Dayal Sharma aged about 25 years son of Ravi Kant Sharma, Resident of Nirsa Bazar, Bhamal, P.O + P.S-Nirsa District Dhanbad (Jharkhand). …. Petitioner. Versus - 1. The state of Jharkhand 2. Monika Kumari @ Monika Sharma W/O Deen Dayal Sharma D/O Anil Prasad, resident of Near reliance Tower, Digwadih No. 10, Ghatwar Basti, P.O Jealgora P.S- Jorapokhar District Dhanbad opposite parties. … Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Kr. Maltiyar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, APP ------ 2/18.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with CP Case No. 1661 /2019 for the alleged offence under section 498 A of the I.P.C and 4 of the D.P. Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case is arising out of the complaint case and the petitioner happened to be the husband of the complainant and there are general and omnibus allegations. He further submits that the entire family members have been made accused in this case and the other family members have already been granted bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the case is arising out of the complaint case and the petitioner happened to be the husband of the complainant. 5. Considering that the case is arising out of the complaint case 2026:JHHC:7508 2 and the entire family members have been made accused under Section 498A of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, in that view of the matter, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and condition and sureties, the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 18.03.2026 R.Kumar