Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14163 (AP)

YEDDULA SUNITHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/28/2023 · 2026-03-31

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010001622023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 28/2023 Between: 1. YEDDULA SUNITHA, W/O @ SHARADA W/O YEDDULA RAVI, AGE 37 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O PLOT NO.73, WARD NO.31, BELLARY CITY, KARNATAKA STATE 2. YEDDULA RAVI, S/O YEDDULA RAMULU, -AGE 41 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O PLOT NO.73, WARD NO.31, BELLARY CITY, KARNATAKA STATE ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, AMARAVATI 2. NAYAKA VIJAYA LAKSHMI RAMYA, D/O N.SUDHAKAR, AGE 22 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O 363/GF, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtbe pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.no.I2 of 2020 on the file of I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Kurnool as against the Petitioners herein and pass 2 SRK,J Crl.P.No.28 of 2023 IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the Proceedings in CC.no.12 of 2020 on the file of I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate: Kurnool as against the Petitioners herein pending disposal of the Quash Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 SRK,J Crl.P.No.28 of 2023 The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein/Accused to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.12 of 2020 of the file of I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kurnool. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:01.04.2026 PGT