Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:14376
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 371 of 2026 Karan Kurre S/o Late Pardeshi Kurre, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village- Mopki, Police Station- Bhatapara, Gramin, District Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Bhatapara, Gramin, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Shubham Bajpai, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order On Board 25/03/2026
1. Learned State counsel submits that notice has been served on 13/03/2026 to the mother of the victim who is complainant of the case.
2. Despite of notice being served, the complainant is not present either in person or through her counsel or through virtual mode from DLSA. Hence, the Court proceeds to hear the matter. GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.03.28 15:38:09 +0530
2
3. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), for grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.443/2025, registered at Police Station Bhatapara, Gramin, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 137 (2), 87, 64 (1), 65 (1) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under section 4, 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 10/07/2025, mother of the prosecutrix lodged her missing report at Police Outpost-Nipniya, Police Station-Bhatapara, Gramin, District-Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) and stating that her minor daughter aged about 14 years 4 months 10 days had gone somewhere from 09/07/2025 without any intimation, they searched here and there but she did not trace out but during the course of investigation prosecutrix/victim recovered from possession of complainant herself, thereafter her statement under section 183 of B.N.S.S. 2023 has been recorded before the concern Judicial Magistrate and then applicant has been made accused in crime in question.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would submit that though 183 BNSS statement of the victim goes to show that the victim has stated about the physical relationship established by the applicant but there appears to be no medical report to prove the said fact. He would submit that the applicant is a permanent resident of address as mentioned in the cause title and there is no chance of his
3 absconding or tampering with the prosecution case, therefore he prays to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail.
6. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and he submits that the victim is a minor girl aged 14 years and 4 months and even if her consent is taken, it is immaterial, therefore the applicant is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail.
7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
8. Perused the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS who is a minor girl aged 14 years and 4 months and even if her consent is taken, it is immaterial. Considering the gravity of the allegation and also considering the fact that investigation is still going on, therefore I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.
9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant - Karan Kurre, involved in Crime No.443/2025, registered at Police Station Bhatapara, Gramin, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 137 (2), 87, 64 (1), 65 (1) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under section 4, 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is rejected. Sd/-Sd S Sd/- S (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice gouri