1 2026:CGHC:241-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3862 of 2025 Rohit Sahu S/o Seetaram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years R/o Old Vegetable Market, Urga, Ps- Urga, Dist. Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Darri, Dist.- Korba (C.G.) 2 - Xyz Nil ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. K.Tripti Rao, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05.01.2026 1. Heard Ms. K.Tripti Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No.1 / State. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.01.05 16:57:15 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “a) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and quash the impugned chargesheet Dt.17.07.2025 filed in crime no.132/2025 registered at police station Darri, Korba (C.G.) b) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. From perusal of the present petition, it transpires that though the order framing charge dated 25.08.2025 has been annexed in the present petition, but the same has not been challenged and learned counsel for the petitioner has drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a duly constituted petition with an appropriate prayer. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government School for Visual and Hearing Impaired, Tifra, District - Bilaspur (C.G.). 6. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent / State is present. 3 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet