Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14155 (RAJ)

MULAYAM SINGH YADAV SON OF SHRI MANGILAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17013/2026 · 2026-08-24

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:34353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17013/2026 CNR: RJHC020831262026 | URN: CW / 35576U / 2026 Mulayam Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Mangilal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of 140, Chananio Ki Dhani, Lalpura Pachar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Agriculture And Panchayatiraj Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Commissioner, Agriculture And Panchayatiraj Raj Department, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Vaniki Path, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Additional Director, Agriculture (Administration Agriculture And Horticulture Raj Department, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Vaniki Path, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Assistant Director, Agriculture (Extension), Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Kishore Singh Rathore, Assistant Agriculture Officer, Posted At Head Quarter, Farrashpura, Office Of Assistant Director Agriculture Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : Ms. Dhriti Laddha for Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present petition be decided in light of the ratio passed in SBCWP No.14009/2026 titled as Dr. Mahesh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2026:RJ-JP:34353] (2 of 2) [CW-17013/2026] In view of the submissions made, the present petition is disposed of in the light of Dr. Mahesh Meena (supra); it is made clear that the order passed therein shall be fully applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on the present petition. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-229