AMIT PRAKASH v. ANUPAM SHUKLA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/6704/2026 · 2026-10-08
Piyush Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14149 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14149 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6704 of 2026 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. In pursuance of the earlier order passed by this Court, Shri Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned Chief Standing Counsel, has obtained instruction, which is taken on record. Placing reliance upon the aforesaid instruction, learned Standing Counsel submits that the order passed by the writ Court has been duly complied with in its letter and spirit. Learned counsel for the applicant(s) does not dispute the aforesaid position and submits that he has no grievance with regard to compliance of the order. In view of the aforesaid admitted position, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. Consequently, no cause of action survives. Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of. The contempt application shall be consigned to the records. The notice, if any, stands discharged. However, liberty is granted to the applicant(s) to approach this Court by moving an appropriate application, in the event of non-compliance of the order by the opposite party(s) within a period of one month from today. October 9, 2026 / A.N. Mishra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kavindra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Piyush Agrawal,J.) Amit Prakash .....Applicant(s) Anupam Shukla, District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad