Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14146 (AP)

GOLI SIVA RAMA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/43/2026 · 2026-01-04

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010000212026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 43 OF 2026 Between: 1. GOLI SIVA RAMA REDDY, S/O. SURYACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. 5-63, RAMALAYAM STREET, YERRAGUNTAPALLE, CHINTALAPUDI, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY 2 The Court made the following order: The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in seizing the Lorry bearing Nos.AP 39 WF 7889 belongs to the Petitioner, in connection with FIR No.403 of 2025, without following the procedure under the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966. 2. Heard Sri Appavu Muniraj, learned counsel appearing for Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sudeepthi Potluri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been using the subject vehicle for transportation purposes only. On 29.12.2025, the 3rd respondent herein has seized the vehicles alleging that the petitioner has been transporting sand without valid documents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the 3rd respondent has illegally seized the vehicles of the petitioner and registered FIR No.403 of 2025 under Section 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, 3 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. Hence, he prays the Court to direct the respondents to release the vehicle. In support of his contentions, the learned counsel for the petitioner relies on a decision of this Court in W.P.No.35886 of 3 2025, prays the Court to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the said order. He further relies on G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 26.06.2025. 5. The relevant clauses of Clause 19(a) of the said G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries and Commerce (Mines-II), Department, dated 26.06.2025, reads as follows: Q. Offences and Penalties: i. In case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/ un-authorized excavation in the prohibited areas (i.e., within 500 meters from the Ground water structures, Bridges, Dams, Railway lines and cross drainage structures etc.), transportation of sand outside the State and found transporting sand without valid Sand Way bill /invoice shall be penalized as follows; Vehicle Type First Time (In Rs.) Second Time (In Rs.) Tractor Upto 10,000/- Rs.10,001/- to 20,000/- Lorry fitted with upto 10 tires capacity Upto 25,000/- Rs.25,001/- to 50,000/- Lorry fitted with above 10 tires Upto 50,000/- Rs.50,001/- to 1,00,000/- Machinery Upto 50,000/- Rs.50,001/- to 1,00,000/- Thus, he argues that the authorities cannot seize the vehicles for any alleged violations, they could, at the best levy only penalties. 6. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon perusing the material on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.35886 of 2025 dated 23.12.2025 directing the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders in terms of clause 19(a) of G.O.Ms.No.100, Industries and Commerce (Mines-III), Department, dated 4 26.06.2025, for levying penalty if any. After levy of penalty and on payment of such penalty, the seized vehicle shall be released by the 3rd respondent on producing of the receipt of such payment and ownership documents of the vehicle to the satisfaction of the 3rd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 05.01.2026 Note: Issue CC today B/o. BSK 5 26 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 43 OF 2026 Date: 05.01.2026 Note: Issue CC today B/o. BSK