1 2026:HHC:26518 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 459 of 2026 Decided on: 03.07.2026 ________________________________________________ Caspian Phamaceuticals ....Petitioner Versus Amardeep Singh Bhatia & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2, 3 & 5. Mr. Vedant Ranta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.1, wherein it has been stated as under: 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:26518 “11. The application was placed before the 11th Empowered Committee on 04.08.2021, and it was noted that the unit’s application lacked a valid Pollution Control Certificate (PCC). The unit was considered eligible for registration subject to the availability of valid PCC. 12. The Committee examined the application against the criteria and the mandatory requirement set out in Clase 7.3 of the Scheme and observed that, in the absence of a budgetary allocation, the application could not be considered eligible for registration.” 2. Confronted with this, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 3. Consequently the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 3rd July, 2026 Judge (Kiran)