APHC010864232018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 41742/2018 Between: 1. SRI K. SREENIVASULU, S/O. K. JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO. 3-165, WARD.NO.3, NELLA RAMAPPA VEDHI, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT. K. NAGAMANI, W/O. K. SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 3-165, WARD.NO.3, NELLA RAMAPPA VEDHI, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT POLICE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KADIRI URBAN POLICE STATION, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRI URBAN POLICE STATION, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI RAYACHOTI TAJUDDIN BASHA, S/O. LATE KAMAL SAB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. VALI SAB ROAD, KADIRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in threatening the petitioners to settle the civil dispute with Respondent.No.5 and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 & 4 not to interfere in the civil matters pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANTAPAMPALLE RAMPRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.41742 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in threatening the petitioners to settle the civil dispute with Respondent.No.5 and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice in the interest of justice and pass and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Mantapampalle Ramprasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police never interfere with the civil disputes and they did not threaten the petitioners as alleged in the writ petition. No report was received with regard to the alleged incident and no case was registered against the writ petitioner. 4. Considering the above submissions and upon hearing the learned counsel for the writ petitioners, as learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that no report was received against the writ petitioners and no case was registered against the writ petitioners, they will not interfere in the civil disputes, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed without going into merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.01.2026 Pmk 5 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:41742 OF 2018 Date: 08.01.2026 Pmk