Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14140 (JHR)

DEV NARAYAN TUDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./379/2026 · 2026-03-26

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8610 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 379 of 2026 --------- Dev Narayan Tudu aged about 27 years, S/o Lakhan Tudu, Resident of Village- Kendua, P.O.-Aziyamore, P.S.-Deodanr, District-Godda. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : M/s. S.P. Roy, Arya Suman, Ranjit Kumar, Advocates For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-26.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 108/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 (Charge-sheet submitted under Section 108 of BNS, 2023) in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.25/2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.425/2025 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 22.07.2025; as such, he may be released on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation made against the petitioner and the stage of trial, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage; however, petitioner may renew its bail application after three months. 6. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 26, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 30.03.2026