(1) 912 CP-68.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2021 IN WP/14902/2019 MOHAMMED ABDUL SAYEED ALIAS SHAKEEL ABDUL KAREEM AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.R. Raghuwanshi, Advocate holding for Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent-State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2026 Per Court : 1. Heard. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners sought time to take instructions, but it appears that as per order under contempt, respondent No.2 was directed to decide the application of the petitioners for grant of NA permission on it’s own merits, however, the communication dated 16.02.2021 issued by the Collector, Aurangabad indicates that the aforesaid application of the petitioners was not traceable, and therefore, it was opined that if the petitioners again file such application alongwith the necessary documents, it will be decided on it’s own merits. Even otherwise also, it is (2) 912 CP-68.2021.odt mentioned in the said letter that the petitioners had also filed fresh Writ Petition No.1383 of 2021 for the same relief. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt petition and it stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde