Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14139 (BOM)

SUREKHA PUNDLIK WAGH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/356/2014 · 2026-10-01

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 906 CP-256.2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2014 IN WP/776/2012 SUREKHA PUNDLIK WAGH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Priyanka Dayma, Advocate holding for Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1-State. Mr. U.S. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2026 Per Court : . Learned counsel holding for Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the order under contempt is complied with. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde