APHC010674482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35052/2025 Between: R. SHANTAMMA, W/O RAJAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O SOMAPURAM VILLAGE, 64 PEDDURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, SHANTIPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUPPAM POLICE STATION, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RALLA BUDUGURU POLICE STATION, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V KOTA POLICE STATION, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 6. DR KESHAVULU, (GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL DOCTOR) S/O U SUBBANNA, AGE MAJOR, R/O V KOTA SAI GARDEN 1, V KOTA MANDAL, VENKATAGIRIKOTA CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH 7. VISHWANATH, S/O M RAMAIAH, AGE MAJOR, R/O 4-64/2, DODDI PALLI VENKATAGIRIKOTA, VENKATAGIRIKOTA, CHITTOOR. 8. HARI, S/O A NARAYANAPPA, R/O DHAYALAPALLI, V KOTA MANDALAM VENKATAGIRIKOTA CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to forthwith register a First Information Report (FIR) against Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 under the appropriate provisions of the BNSS based on the representation dated 28.08.2025 filed by the Petitioner, and to conduct a fair, impartial and expeditious investigation into the alleged assault, threats, and intimidation, including the incident dated 23.08.2025 near Dasarlapalli Village Such inaction on the part of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 is arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of the Petitioner's fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents Nos. 2 to 5 to take all necessary protective measures to ensure the safety and security of the Petitioner and her family.” 2. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by one Rajareddy, who is the husband of the Petitioner herein, Police called both parties for preliminary enquiry and found that the matter is of civil nature. It is further submitted that, no crime has been registered against the Petitioner. 3. Sri Kode Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the Petitioner to work out her remedies according to law. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out herremedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35052 of 2025 Dt.02.01.2026 Dinesh