APHC010139492019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.No.1 of 2026 IN / AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 511/2019 Between: S.MASTHANBI, W/O. MASTHAN, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GOPAI NAGAR 5 LINE, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 2. MALAVARTHI NARASIMHARAO, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, RIO. 5 LINE, GOPAINAGAR, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) has been filed by the Petitioner / De facto complainant, impugning the judgment dated 27.11.2018 passed in Crl.A.No.106 of 2016 on the file of the Court of VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole, reversing the judgment dated 2 20.05.2016 passed in C.C.No.14 of 2015 by the learned II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ongole for the offences under Sections 448, 509 and 325 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) 2. I.A.No.1 of 2026 is filed by the Petitioner / De facto complainant seeking permission to record the compromise the matter with the Respondent No.2 / Accused by allowing the present Criminal Revision Case. 3. Petitioner / De facto complainant and Respondent No.2 / Accused appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. Petitioner / De facto complainant by way of an affidavit would submit that at the intervention of elders and well-wishers of both parties, the matter was amicably settled between her and the Accused and that she has resolved all the grievances against the Accused and that she has no objection to record the compromise and close the Criminal Revision Case. 6. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed confirming the judgment dated 27.11.2018 passed in Crl.A.No.106 of 2016 on the file of the Court of VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.02.2026 Dinesh 3 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.No.1 of 2026 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:511 OF 2019 Dt.05.02.2026 Dinesh