1 2026:CGHC:19299 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3639 of 2026 1 - Smt. Tomeshwari Sinha W/o Shri Nohar Sinha Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Khiarjhiti, Post Dumardihkhurd, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur C.G. 3 - The Collector- . Balod District Balod C.G. 4 - Chief Excutive Officer, Zila Panchayat Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Excutive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 6 - Chief Excutive Officer, Zila Panchayat Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon C.G. 7 - Chief Excutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Rajnandgaon District Rajnanadgaon C.G. 8 - President/secretary/treasurer, Sagar Women's Cluster Organization -Bhardakala Gundardehi District. Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents 2 For Petitioner : Smt. Deepa Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 27 /04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respndents. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 10.03.2026 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may issue a suitable writ directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to resume his duties. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct that the total amount of Rs. 1,38,734/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Four) deposited by the petitioner into the account of Sagar Mahila Sankul Sangathan, Bhardkala on 17.03.2026, be refunded. 10.5 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.” 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal under the law. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY