Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14128 (AP)

R.Suresh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/40781/2014 · 2026-03-08

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010461222014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 40781/2014 Between: 1.R.SURESH,, S/O SRI.NAGESHU, OCC: FORMER FIELD ASSISTANT MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GURANTEE SCHEME, VISHWANADHAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYATH, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT A. P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order in RC.No.D3/70/EGS/2013 dt.11.05.2013 passed by the Respondent no.2 removing the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant of Vishwanadhapuram Gram Panchayath, Lingasamudram mandal, Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and contrary to the rules and consequently set aside the same with a direction to the respondents to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant of Vishwanadhapuram Gram Panchayath, Lingasamudram mandal, Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 51117 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings in RC.No.D3/70/EGS/2013 dt.11.05.2013 passed by the Respondent no.2 removing the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant of Vishwanadhapuram Gram Panchayath, Lingasamudram mandal, Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh and to continue as to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant of 2 Vshwanadhapuram Gram Panchayath, Lingasamudram mandal, Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.C N MOORTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.40781 OF 2014 ORDER: 1. There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the period of engagement of the petitioner on contract had expired long back. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 09.03.2026 KGM 4 117 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.40781 of 2014 Dated 09.03.2026 KGM