Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14127 (KAR)

M/S. ELECTRO CONTROLS v. M/S. SIEMENS LTD

CRL.RP/783/2022 · 2026-03-27

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17675 CRL.RP No. 783 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 783 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. ELECTRO CONTROLS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM NO. 7, B.V.K IYENGAR ROAD BENGALURU - 53, REP. BY PARTNER SRI. B.V. DWARAKANATH. 2. SRI. B.V. DWARAKANATH AGED 69 YEARS S/O LATE G. VISHWANATHA RAO, PARTNER, M/S. ELECTRO CONTROLS NO. 7, B.V.K IYENGAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 053. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PREETHAM P, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. D. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE; VIDE ORDE DATED 27.03.2026, P2 IS DEAD AND THIE PETITION IS DISMISSED AS ABATED IN RESPECT OF P2) AND: M/S. SIEMENS LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17675 CRL.RP No. 783 of 2022 NO. 130, PANDURANG BUDKHAR MARG WORLI, MUMBAI - 18. AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, JYOTI MAHAL NO.49, ST. MARKS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY THOMAS MATHEWS, CHIEF MANGER - MARKETING …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KAVYA N, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JIDESH KUMAR M.D, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN CRL.A.NO.1434/2015 PASSED BY THE LV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE DATED 24.01.2022 AND THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION PASSED IN C.C.NO.19266/2006 DATED 07.11.2015 BY THE LEARNED XX A.C.M.M., AND XXII A, S, C, J BANGALORE BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17675 CRL.RP No. 783 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Petitioner No.2 said to have died. Dead report is furnished reporting the death of petitioner No.2 on 19.08.2025. As such, petition insofar as petitioner No.2 is dismissed as abated. Since, there is no proper representation on behalf of petitioner No.1, as it is a firm, petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/-S (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10