APHC010230282011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 Between: 1. PYDI HARI PRIYA, W/O SREENIVASA RAO C/O RAYAPUREDDI SIMHADRI RAO R.T.C. CONDUCTOR, R/O SEETHAMPETA ROAD, NEAR N.K.RAJAPURAM, 1. PYDI SREENIVASA RAO, S/o Venkata Rao Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 609 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 22 Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO The Court made the following: 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 PYDI HARI PRIYA, W/O SREENIVASA RAO C/O RAYAPUREDDI SIMHADRI RAO R.T.C. CONDUCTOR, R/O SEETHAMPETA ROAD, NEAR AND PYDI SREENIVASA RAO, S/o Venkata Rao R/o Gajulakollivalasa Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 609 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 22-2-2011 in MOP.NO. 88 of 2008 on the file of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam the Appellant: K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondent: ARAVALA RAMA RAO The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3572] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 PYDI HARI PRIYA, W/O SREENIVASA RAO C/O RAYAPUREDDI SIMHADRI RAO R.T.C. CONDUCTOR, R/O SEETHAMPETA ROAD, NEAR ...APPELLANT R/o Gajulakollivalasa Village, ...RESPONDENT that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the 2011 in MOP.NO. 88 of 2008 on the file of the 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) The appellant is the respondent in M.O.P.No.88 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam. The said M.O.P., was filed by the respondent/petitioner seeking a decree of divorce by dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the parties on 14.05.2003. The learned Court allowed the petition and granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage. Challenging the said order, the present CMA has been filed under section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has been settled before the learned Trial Court. 4. On perusal of the record, it is seen that the Mediation Center has submitted a report dated 20.02.2026, indicating that the mediation was conducted on 25.07.2025. As per the mediator’s report, the matter had already been settled between the parties before the learned Trial Court. The compromise agreement dated 23.06.2012 has been filed along with the report. 5. Upon perusal of the agreement dated 23.06.2012 annexed to the mediator report, it is not evident whether the said compromise was entered 3 into before the Court, acted upon pursuant to any Court order, or was an out of court settlement. 6. So, without observing if such settlement dated 23.06.2012 was in the learned Trial Court as mentioned in the report of the mediation, but as the appellant’s counsel is not present, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dated: 05.03.2026 SAK 4 126 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2011 Dated: 05.03.2026 SAK