HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24023 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Mishra, learned Senior Counsel, Sri Bhanu Prakash Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Agam Jain, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the objection filed by him on 03.06.2026 has not yet been decided. 3. Sri Shashi Prakash Rai holding brief of Ms. Harshita Raghuvanshi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the aforesaid objection shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within the time prescribed under the applicable statutory provisions. 4. Without entering into the merits of the case, we direct the competent authority to consider and decide the objection filed by the petitioner on 03.06.2026, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 5. Needless to say, the objection shall be decided after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned stakeholders. 6. With these observations/directions the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 6, 2026 vijay krishna Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhanu Prakash Gupta, Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Agam Jain, C.S.C., Harshita Raghuvanshi (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ajay Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad