Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14113 (AP)

U D BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23643/2024 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010459142024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23643/2024 Between: 1. U D BABU, S/O.U.LMAMSAB, AGE-50 YEARS, OCC-WEAVER, R/O.SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 2. SMT.U.D.SHAKEELA, W/O.U.D.BABA FAKRUDDIN AGE-43 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O.SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 3. U.D.HUSSAIN BEE, W/O.U.D.KULLAYAPPA, AGE-51 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.2-304, MARUTHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSLIDAR, SOMANDEPALLI MANDAL SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOMANDEPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 6. VATTI MUTYALU P MUTYALU, S/O.VATTI ANJANEYULU, AGE- MAJOR, WORKING AS VRA, SOMANDEPALLI MANDAL SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th And 6th respondents making hectic efforts to register a false FIR under section of SC ST, POA Act, against the petitioners for illegal settlement of the land in Sy.No.763-2 an extent of Ac.1.30 cents of Somendapalli Village And Mandal of Sri Satyasai District, which is purely Civil dispute is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th And 6th respondents not to interfere in to the petitioners land in Sy.No.763-2 an extent of Ac.1.30 cents of Somendapalli Village And Mandal of Sri Satyasai District by registering any false case under SC ST, POA Act, without resorting any remedy by Civil Court in the interest of Justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to direct the 5th And 6th respondents not to interfere in to the petitioners land in Sy.No.763-2 an extent of Ac. 1.30 cents of Somendapalli Village & Mandal of Sri Satyasai District by registering any false case under SC ST, POA Act, without resorting any remedy by Civil Court in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. T VENU GOPAL THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23643/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th And 6th respondents making hectic efforts to register a false FIR under section of SC ST, POA Act, against the petitioners for illegal settlement of the land in Sy.No.763-2 an extent of Ac.1.30 cents of Somendapalli Village And Mandal of Sri Satyasai District, which is purely Civil dispute is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th And 6th respondents not to interfere in to the petitioners land in Sy.No.763-2 an extent of Ac.1.30 cents of Somendapalli Village And Mandal of Sri Satyasai District by registering any false case under SC ST, POA Act, without resorting any remedy by Civil Court in the interest of Justice and to pass…” 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by Vatti Mutyalu-6th respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the police found that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and therefore no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23643/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 221 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 23643/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV