Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14110 (JHR)

YADUPATI RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./754/2026 · 2026-02-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3653 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 754 of 2026 ---- Yadupati Rana, aged about 38 years, son of Lakshi Pada Rana, resident of H.N.33 Village Rajabandh, PO and PS Rajabandh, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate ---- 2/11.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barsole PS Case No.35 of 2022, for offence registered under section 323, 341, 452,384, 504, 506, 34 of IPC, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ghatshila. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be labourer and was discharging his work in the office of Falak Industrial Fuels Pvt Ltd and false allegations are made against the petitioner and 15 to 20 unknown persons of entering into the office of the Manager of the said company who happened to be the informant and demanding Rs.50,000/-. He submits that all the persons have gone there to demand their wages and for that, the altercation took place and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph no.16 of the petition. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that 2026:JHHC:3653 2 allegations are there of entering into the office of the Manager of the said company. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner and 15 to 20 unknown persons of entering into the office of Manager of the said company and it has been pointed out that petitioner is labourer and was discharging labour work in the office of the said company and for wages, he has entered into the office of the Manager of the said company and further the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as aforesaid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. 6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ghatshila, in connection with Barsole PS Case No.35 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 11.02.2026 SI/