Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14101 (GAU)

HARILAL DAS v. MAMTAZ KHATUN

I.A.(Civil)/1682/2026 · 2026-09-10

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010115632024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1682/2026 HARILAL DAS S/O LATE DHARANI DAS, R/O BILORTARI HATI, P.O. AND MOUZA- BARPETA, P.S. AND DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS MAMTAZ KHATUN W/O SUKUR ALI, R/O DAKSHIN SHITOLI, MOUZA- MANDIA, P.S.- BAGHBOR, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781308, P/R/A AZAD NAGAR (NEAR KALI MANDIR), BARPETA, P.S.- BARPETA, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781315 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N K KALITA, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 11.09.2026 Heard Mr. N K Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 33 days in filing the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice on the respondent would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant