APHC010505572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4314/2024 Between: 1. SSDR PROJECTS PVT LTD, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER S.DASARADHA RAMIREDDY S/O. YANADI REDDY,AGE. 57 YEARS, R/O. 27-3-572, RATNAM SCHOOL STREET,A.C.NAGAR, NEAR RATNAM SCHOOL, NELLORE STONEHOUSEPET, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. SRI ASHOK KUMAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SRI VENUGOPAL, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF,PANCHAYAT RAJ (P.I.U), KAVALI,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503 5. SRI SASHI BHUSHAN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR-522- 503 R 5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 12.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO-4314 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the 2 orders dt. 02.07.2024 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 12378/2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the present Proposed Respondent No.5 Sri Shashi Bhushan, Principal Secretary of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur. - 522503 in the above C.C.No.4314 of 2024 as Proposed Respondent No.5 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. In view of the same, as nothing survives in this matter, the contempt case is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 30.01.2026 NNN