Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14100 (BOM)

PRASHANT SUNIL SHELKE v. THE JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER-1, NAGPUR

/7413/2026 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 7 wp 7413.26.odt..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 7413 OF 2026 Prashant Sunil Shelke .Vs. The Joint Charity Commissioner-1, Nagpur __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr Prashant Gode, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Sangeeta Jachak, AGP for the respondent/State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATED : 01.10.2026 By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 06.05.2026 passed by Joint Charity Commissioner-1, Nagpur rejecting the application for condonation of delay which was caused in preferring the revision application against the order of Assistant Charity Commissioner, Nagpur. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who submitted that the petitioner applied for certified copies and there was a delay in receiving the said certified copies therefore, delay is caused. On pointing out that absolutely no reason is mentioned in the application regarding sufficient and reasonable caused which was filed before Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that liberty would be granted to him to file fresh application by assigning the specific reasons for condonation of delay. 2026:BHC-NAG:13112 2 7 wp 7413.26.odt..odt 3. Learned AGP for the State has no objection for the same. 4. In view of that, it would be in the interest of justice to remand back the matter to Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur to reconsider fresh application of the present petitioner assigning the reasons for the condonation of delay. 5. In view of that, I proceed to pass following order:- 6. ORDER (i) Liberty is granted to the applicant/petitioner file a fresh application assigning the reasons. (ii) The matter is remanded back to the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur with a direction that Joint Charity Commissioner shall consider the application, if filed by the petitioner afresh by assigning the reasons. (iii) The Joint Charity Commissioner shall consider the application for condonation of delay appropriately in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court. (iv) The order dated 06.05.2026 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur rejecting the application for condonation of delay is hereby set aside. 7. Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J.) manisha Signed by: Mrs. Manisha Shewale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 03/10/2026 13:00:18