Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14099 (JHR)

AJAY TURI ALIAS AJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./744/2026 · 2026-02-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:3632 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 744 of 2026 1. Ajay Turi @ Ajay Kumar, aged about 26 years, son of Jahal Turi 2. Sachin Turi, aged about 18 years, son of Gopal Turi Both residents of Vill-Lokay, P.O.-Lokay, P.S. Lokainayanpur, District- Giridih, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P 02/ 11.02.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tisri P.S. Case Noi. 50 of 2025, registered under section 310(2) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned J.M. Ist Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that the name of the petitioners has come in the confessional statement and nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioners are accompanies of dacoity along with another persons. 5. Allegations are there of looting amount of Rs. 1,55,000/- as well as motorcycle. The petitioners are accompanies of apprehended co-accused persons. 6. In view of above I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. However it is open to the petitioners to comply observations of the learned Sessions which is disclosed in the impugned order. Dt.11.02.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-