SHAIK MALI BASHA & ANO. v. SECY., SCHOOL EDUCATION & ANO.
WP/13341/2013 · 2026-03-10
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010211132013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13341/2013 Between:
1. SHAIK MALI BASHA & ANO., S/O DEENASAHEB, AGED 50 YRS OCC: PGT, HINDI, APR SCHOOL (BC) NANDYAL H.NO. 25-233-A, SANJEEVA NAGAR, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
2. K.J.SUDHA RANI, D/O K.JOHN AGE: 53 YRS, OCC: PGT, MATHS APR SCHOOL (BC) NANDYAL, H.NO. 4-77, KRANTHI NAGAR, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRCT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SECY SCHOOL EDUCATION ANO, SCHOOL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD
2. A P RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION INSTITUTION SOCIETY REGD, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, GAGANVIHAR NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in seeking to repatriate the Petitioners from Zone IV to Zone III as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order,1975 and the order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 28/09/2011 in W.A.Nos.750 & 764 of 2011
2
and batch consequently set aside the proceedings Rc.No.6714/A2-1/11 dt.14/09/2011 issued by the Respondent no.2 in respect of the petitioners and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in Zone IV IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3543 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the hearing the interim order granted in WPMP.No. 16375 of 2013 in WP.No. 13341 of 2013 dt. 29.04.2013, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 16375 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the repatriation of the petitioners in pursuance of the proceedings Rc.No.6714/A2-1/11 dt.14/09/2011 issued by the respondent no.2, pending the disposal of writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 11.03.2026 PNS