APHC010440402013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3612/2013 Between: 1. SHAIKH MOULA ALI,, SH-10618 JR.ENGINEER, CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE GROUP, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA,S/O ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O H.NO.383, PHASE-II COLONY,SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIRECTOR SDSC SATISH DHAVAN SPACE CENTRE, SHAR, SRI HARI KOTA RANGE, NELLORE DISTRICT-524124. 2. THE GROUP HEAD, CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE GROUP (CMG), SRIHARIKOTA COMMON FACILITIES (SCF), SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SRI SD SULAMAN BASHA, SH.10657, ASST.ENGINEER, VAST, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SRI G SHANKARAIAH SH 11110, ASST.ENGINEER, C.M.G, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI K U N VARMA, SH.10775, ASST.ENGINEER, SPROB, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. SRI S PREMANADHA REDDY, SH.10320, ASST.ENGINEER, R.0, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. SRI B SELVA KUMAR, SH.11121, ASST.ENGINEER, C.M.G, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 8. SRI SK YESDHAN BASHA, SH.10825, ASST.ENGINEER, SPROB, SDSC SHAR, SRIHARIKOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. ALEKHYA TADASINA(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Sri S.A.K.Mynuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. 2. The notice addressed to the petitioner is returned unserved with an endorsement ‘unclaimed’. The petitioner was aged 59 years when the writ petition was filed. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to place his name above respondent Nos.3 to 8 for promoting him as Assistant Engineer on par with respondent Nos.3 to 8. The petitioner has attained the age of superannuation during pendency of the writ petition. In such circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed on merits. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.30.03.2026 SR