VINAY KUMAR SAHU @ BUNTI SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11700/2025 · 2026-01-29
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14093 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14093 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2308 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11700 of 2025
------ Vinay Kumar Sahu @ Bunti Sahu, son of Ram Kumar Sahu, resident of Village Charda, Tetar Kocha, P.O. Charda, P.S. Sisai, District Gumla
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. ------
Order No.02 / Dated : 29.01.2026
Bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner- Vinay Kumar Sahu @ Bunti Sahu, who is in custody since 13.11.2025 in connection Bhandra P.S. Case No. 84 of 2022(S) for the offence registered under Sections 307, 452, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Lohardaga, is pressed into motion.
Matter involves the named accused persons came to the place of occurrence and resorted to blank firing to terrorize the people.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that FIR is lodged against four named accused persons. He is not amongst them, and his name has come-up in the confessional statement of the co-accused. It is also submitted that he has no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. opposed the bail petition, but has not disputed the factual assertions made by the petitioner.
Under the circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit Uploaded 30.01.2026