APHC010066842026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4005/2026 Between: 1. MUDE KRISHNA NAIK, C/O. MUDE CHATRE NAIK, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS OCC FARMAR, R/O. 17-76, ST COLONY, REDDIKUNTA THANDA, H/O. REDDIPALLI VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 2. M. SAKUNTHALAMMA, C/O MUDE KRISHNA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCC FARMAR, R/O. 17-76, ST COLONY, REDDIKUNTA THANDA, H/O. REDDIPALLI VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS , PRINICPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUIDLINGS VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT.522 238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUTAPARTHY SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT,515 133 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PUTAPARTHY DIVISION, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT,515 133 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NALLAMADA MANDAL, NALLAMADA, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT,515 501 5. B NARSIMHULU NAIK, S/O THIRUPAL NAIK, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , R/O. REDDIKUNTA THANDA, NALLAMADA MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 515 501 2 6. PEDDA NARAYANA SWAMY NAIK, S/O. NARSIMHULU NAIK AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS , R/O. REDDIKUNTA THANDA, NALLAMADA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.515 501 7. B CHINNA NARAYANA SWAMY NAIK, S/O. NARSIMHULU NAIK AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS , R/O. REDDIKUNTA THANDA, NALLAMADA MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.515 501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official Respondents more particularly the action of the 4th respondent in not considering my representation dated 29.12.2025 seeking to conduct survey and removal of encroachments made by the unofficial respondents over the Rastha/public road notified in revenue records in Sy.No. 996 is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the law, and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to restore the notified rastha/public road in Sy.No. 996 to its original condition by providing access to the agricultural lands of situated in Sy.No. 999-3D and 996-11 situated in Reddipalli Village, Nallamada Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District by duly taking into consideration of my representation dated 29.12.2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent to 29.12.2025 forthwith pending disposal of the above Writ consider my representation dated petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAVULURU KRISHNA SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. In spite of service of notices, none appears for the respondent Nos.5 to 7. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the official respondents more particularly the action of the 4th respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 29.12.2025 seeking to conduct survey and removal of encroachments made by the unofficial respondents over the rastha/ public road notified in revenue records in Sy.No.996. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated nil submits that the representation of the petitioners will be considered by following the due procedure. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioners are permitted to make representation afresh to the 4th respondent enclosing all the necessary documents in support of their claim within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of such representation from the petitioners, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the 4th respondent strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners, the respondent Nos.5 to 7 and others concerned, upon verification of 4 the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months thereafter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 05.03.2026 NNN