SANDEEP SINGH SON OF SHRI MALKEET SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16261/2026 · 2026-08-20
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14085 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14085 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:33436] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16261/2026 CNR: RJHC020807172026 | URN: CW / 34369U / 2026 Sandeep Singh Son Of Shri Malkeet Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Binjh Bayala, Tehsil Padampur, District Ganganagar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Additional Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Armed Constabulary (R.a.c.) Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Dy. Inspector General Of Police, Armed Battalion Second, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. Inspector General Police, Banswara, Range Banswar (Raj.)
6. Commandant, Maharana Pratap Battalion, R.a.c. (I.r.), Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 20/08/2026
1. Defect/s pointed out by the Registry is provisionally over- ruled.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to decide the representation dated 24.06.2026 sent
[2026:RJ-JP:33436] (2 of 2) [CW-16261/2026] by the petitioners in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024).
3. Heard.
4. This Court directs Respondent/competent authority to consider the abovesaid representation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012).
5. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J 42/CHANDAN