1 2026:CGHC:3096 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 680 of 2023 1 - Smt. Anupa Khutle D/o Rajendra Khutle Aged About 45 Years R/o Pathariya Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.), Present Address Dipupara Tarbahar Bilaspur, Police Station Tarbahar, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Yuvraj Khutle S/o Rajendra Khutle Aged About 16 Years Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Anupa Khutle, R/o Pathariya Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.), Present Address Dipupara Tarbahar Bilaspur, Police Station Tarbahar, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Kumhari Yamini Khutle D/o Rajendra Khutle Aged About 12 Years Through Their Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Anupa Khutle, R/o Pathariya Police Station Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.), Present Address Dipupara Tarbahar Bilaspur, Police Station Tarbahar, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicants versus Rajendra Kumar Khutle S/o Jethu Khutle Aged About 53 Years Occupation Clerk, Govt. Higher Sec. School Jota, Vikas Khand - Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) R/o Pathariya, Police Station - Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : None Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 19 .01.2026 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the court below and after being satisfied may kindly be pleased to:- 1. Set aside/quash the impugned order dated order dated 22.05.2023, passed in Misc. Cr. Case No. 929/2022, by Principal Judge, Family Court Bilaspur (C.G.) and thereby enhance the maintenance granted by the Court below. and/or 2. and/or pass any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit as per the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order as well as original records be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan