Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14080 (ALL)

BEENA v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/16339/2026 · 2026-10-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16339 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed challenging a notice dated 12.08.2026 by which the petitioner has been directed to vacate the house allotted to the petitioner at Meerut. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been transferred from Meerut to Baghpat by order dated 11.04.2026 and has been relieved on 10.05.2026. It has been further submitted that the son of the petitioner is studying in Class-XII in Meerut and in view of the transfer policy of the State, the petitioner may be permitted to stay in the official accommodation, till her son complete Class-XII. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that the petitioner may move a representation before respondent no. 2 for redressal of his grievance. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation before respondent no. 2 within a week and in case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no. 2 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the representation, after giving opportunity of hearing to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irfan Ahmad Malik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Beena .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. 6. Till the final disposal of the representation, the petitioner may not be compelled to vacate the house in question. 7. It is made clear that in case the petitioner fails to file representation with the time prescribed by this Court, the interim protection granted by this Court shall automatically come to an end. October 6, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16339 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad