APHC010218702026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 11759/2026 Between: 1. NARELLA VENKATA RAJU,, AGE 43YRS, S/O.RAMANA, 17-8-38/14B REVENUE COLONY WARD NO. 11 SAI BABA GUDI, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD, Prakash nagar, Raj amahendravaram, E.G.Dist. Pin -533103 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent in seizing the petitioners dwelling house bearing Door No. 17-8-38/148, Revenue Colony, Ward No. 11, near Sai Baba Gudi, Kakinada, Kakinada District, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India, as well as the principles of natural justice. Consequently, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to issue a fresh notice to the petitioner in accordance with law and to release the seizure of the said house. It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent to provide an opportunity and grant reasonable time to the petitioner to pay the due instalment amount, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION No.11759 of 2026 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) After advancing arguments to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) by filing an appropriate application to ventilate his grievance in accordance with law. 2. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is granted with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal by filing an appropriate application to ventilate his grievance in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date: 30.04.2026 SA 4 60 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION No.11759 of 2026 Date: 30.04.2026 SA