Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007942026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/20/2026 Kiyang Mize and 5 Ors permanent Resident of Bolung, PO an PS Roing, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Ruchu Niji Age: Occupation : Son of Late Taru Niji residing at Lekhi Village PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Bengia Kagung Age: Occupation : Son of Late Bengia Tajak permanent resident of Pingang Village PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Mindu Phuntso Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Domchung Phuntso permanent resident of Village Bongleng PO Mukto PS Jang Tawang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Gungli (Loa) Tagang Age: Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 Son of Late Loa (Gungli) Tache permanent resident of Pathuk Village PO Parsi Parlo PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Puluk Gadi Age: Occupation : Son of Late Ikpu Gadi permanent resident of Degom Village PO and PS Tirin Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Manish Kumar Gupta and Anr IAS, The Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:A K Singh Age: 0 Occupation : Commissioner (Power) Department of Power Itanagar Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Bedanta Kaushik, Takar Bagang,Pankaj Borah Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 10.09.2026 (S.K. Medhi, J.) Heard Shri T. Bagang, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri N. Ratan, learned Counsel for respondent 1 and Shri L. Perme, learned Counsel for respondent no. 2. Page No.# 3/3 Shri Perme, learned Counsel has placed before this Court a copy of the memorandum dated 30.08.2026 issued by the Commissioner, Power as per which the order of this Court dated 13.02.2026 passed in WA/28/2024 have been complied with. A copy of the said memorandum along with the enclosures has been furnished to Shri Bagang, learned Counsel for the petitioners. In view of the aforesaid development, we are of the opinion that there is no requirement to continue further with this contempt petition and accordingly the same is closed. The copy of the memorandum dated 30.08.2026 along with the enclosures shall made part of the record. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant