Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14075 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/40395/2026 · 2026-10-05

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40395 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Guru Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.5, and Sri Sandeep Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the District and Police Administration not to interfere with the petitioner's possession and not to extend any assistance to respondent no.5, who is trying to interfere with the possession of the petitioner. 3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that though notices have been issued to respondent no.5, he has not entered appearance till date. 4. Upon a pointed query, Sri Brijesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.5, submits that his client is appearing in the pending Suit No. 363 of 2026. 5. In these circumstances, we dispose of this petition with a direction to respondent no.5 to appear in the pending suit for permanent injunction filed by the petitioner in Original Suit No.363 of 2026 (Pradeep Kumar Agrawal Vs. Dhruv Singh and others) on or before 15.10.2026 and file his objection to the temporary injunction application. Irrespective of whether the objections are filed or not, the trial court shall dispose of the pending temporary injunction application within two months, after affording an adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Guru Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pradeep Kumar Agrawal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. For a period of three months from today or until the disposal of the temporary injunction application by the trial court whichever is earlier, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the nature and possession of the suit property. The parties are further directed not to create any third-party interest in the suit property during the aforesaid period. October 6, 2026 Lbm/- WRIC No. 40395 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad