- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18087 CMP No. 652 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO. 652 OF 2025 BETWEEN: M/S. TALENT TRIBE CONSULTING PVT LTD CIN : U74999TN2017PTC116715 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.207, A BLOCK, BETA WING, REHEJA TOWERS, 177/10, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE: MRS. SUJATHA SELWYN …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAMAN JHABAKH.K., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. SOBHA LIMITED (DIVISION GLAZING AND METAL WORKS) CIN NO: U26954KA1995PTC018208 PLOT NO: 10, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, JIGANI BOMMASANDRA LINK ROAD, BOMMASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560105 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18087 CMP No. 652 of 2025 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MR. RAJESH NAIR …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.S.RAJGOPAL, SENIOR ADV. FOR SRI. H.MUJTABA, ADVOCATE) THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO (1) EXERCISE ITS POWER UNDER SEC.11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AND APPOINT A SUITABLY QUALIFIED PERSON AS THE SECOND ARBITRATOR (RESPONDENTS NOMINEE) TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT (2) DIRECT THAT THE TWO ARBITRATORS (THE PETITIONERS NOMINEE AND THE ARBITRATOR APPOINTED BY THIS HONBLE COURT) SHALL THEN JOINTLY APPOINT THE THIRD AND PRESIDING ARBITRATOR AS PER CLAUSE 12 OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 1.07.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18087 CMP No. 652 of 2025 ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, Sri. Naman Jhabakh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. In this regard, learned Senior Counsel Sri. P.S.Rajgopal appearing on behalf of Sri. H.Mujtaba, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that they have no objection for withdrawal of the petition. 2. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34