Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14069 (BOM)

MANIK S/O GANPATRAO GHATOL (DEAD) THR. LRS. SAU. RAJKAMAL SUBHASHRAO LOKHANDE AND OTHERS v. SAU. SHARDA W/O RAVINDRA KSHIRSAGAR

SA/31/2020 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 1 34-sa 31-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2020 Manik Ganpatrao Ghatol and anr. Vs. Sharda Ravindra Kshirsagar ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.A.S.Ponkshe counsel h/f Mr.P.A.Dharaskar, counsel for the AppellantS. Mr.V.R.Mishra counsel h/f Mr. H.M.Bobade,counsel for the respondent. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE : 30/09/2026 1. It appears from the record that the present appeal was earlier restored. However, thereafter, none appeared on behalf of the appellants before the Court. Today, the matter was listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. Learned counsel Mr.A.S.Ponkshe holding for Mr. P.A.Dharaskar, counsel for the Appellants submitted that there is no substantial question of law involved in the present appeal and, therefore, the appeal may be disposed of accordingly. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned proxy counsel appearing for the appellants that no substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal, the appeal stands dismissed. JUDGE Kavita Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 01/10/2026 17:50:06