Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14068 (JHR)

ARUN KUMAR PATRALEKH ALLIAS ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11337/2025 · 2026-01-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:996 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.11337 of 2025 Arun Kumar Patralekh @ Arun Kumar, aged about-26 Years, son of Sandeep Kumar Patralekh, resident of Village Kulmandih, P.O.-Sarwan, P.S. Sarwan, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand).…. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Pramod Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ 4/15.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.- 132 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 111(2) (B), 111(3), 111 (4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 & under Sections- 66(B), 66(C), 66 (D) 84(C) of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of Learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the false allegation is made against the petitioner of cybercrime. He also submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of suspicion and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 11 of the petition. He also submits that there is no money transaction from the alleged mobile, which has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.9.2025. 2026:JHHC:996 2 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the mobile and SIM have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. 5. Considering that from the SIM which is in the name of the petitioner, there is no any money transaction and the petitioner is in custody since 22.9.2025 and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 11 of the petition, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on regular bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime cases Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.- 132 of 2025. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 15.01.2026 R.Kumar