Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:10-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3828 of 2025 1 - Pravin Ratnaparkhi S/o Prabhakar Ratnaparkhi Aged About 45 Years R/o L I G- 95, Pandit Ravishankar Shukla Nagar, District- Korba C.G. 2 - Rajesh Sharma S/o Rajendra Sharma Aged About 43 Years R/o H. No. N-316, Podi Bahar Phase-2, Korba, District Korba C.G. 3 - Suraj Singh S/o Shobharam Suryawanshi Aged About 24 Years R/o 6/287, Dhodhipara Near Shiv Mandir, Korba, District Korba C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines Korba, District Korba C.G. 2 - Harikesh Yadav S/o Late Rampher Yadav Aged About 60 Years R/o Tulsi Nagar, Korba, District- Korba C.G. 3 - Brijesh Kumar Yadav S/o Late Rampher Yadav Aged About 60 Years R/o Tulsi Nagar, Korba, District- Korba C.G.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajkamal Singh and Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, Advocates For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
, Judge
Judgment on Board MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.01.03 11:55:41 +0530
2 Per
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
02.01.2026
1. Heard Mr. Rajkamal Singh (through video conferencing) and Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent No.1/ State. 2. The petitioners have filed this petition praying for following relief:-
“1. This honourable Court may please be kind enough in quashing the First Information Report registered in crime No. 528/2024 dated 03.09.2024 at Police Station: Civil Line Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh in the larger interest of justice. 2. This honourable Court may please be kind enough in granting any other relief in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.”
3. From perusal of the relief clause, it transpires that the petitioners have not mentioned the particulars of the FIR with respect to the offences registered against the petitioners. This shows that they have drafted a vague and sketchy prayer in a casual manner, thereby wasting the precious time of the Court. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners pray to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
3 to file petition afresh, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.
2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Home for Mentally Underdeveloped Children, Mana Camp, District- Raipur (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet